Enemies of Reason Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.

23Jan/1114

A quick spot the difference

Same story, same newspaper. Version 1:

Version 2:

You might not fall off your chair to discover that the first story, about Alex Salmond 'plundering cash from English licence fee payers' (apparently the Welsh don't exist, is in today's main Sunday Express paper; while the second, with a slightly more reserved tone and fears about 'shortbread tin' television, comes from the Scottish Sunday Express.

The story was originally destined for the front page of the paper, with a predictable bit of BBC bashing and a TaxPayers Alliance bonus:

CUT IT NOW (although we don't know if this proposal is going ahead, but we hate taxes anyway, so wurrrgh!)

19Jan/1113

The dirty northerners and their trial by football

This is a guest post by Alex Jackson, who is a writer from Gateshead, Tyne and Wear. He mainly writes unsuccessful novels but takes an interest in editorial pieces on politics, the media and local news. If you'd like to write a guest post for Enemies of Reason, email me at antonvowl@live.co.uk

Think of the North East and what do you visualise? Football? Unemployment? Violence? As a Northerner I wish to wipe these stereotypes from the Southern agenda, yet every now and again someone takes a stab at us Tynesiders (or Wearsiders or whatever), the most recent example being a Tory saying Northerners should be used to pick berries in the Summer. Yes, I am often upset by the Southern attitude to the North, partially due to the belief that we're all thick as bricks. Really? My sister recently left school and got a place at Newcastle University: one of the most prestigious schools in the UK, but I need to get to the point of this editorial: The Tyne-Wear derby.

There were some ugly scenes at the Stadium of Light on Sunday as Asamoah Gyan scored a late equaliser: A fan ran onto the pitch and pushed Steve Harper over, the fans got fighting as per usual and chairs were torn from their moorings and thrown around like deformed beach balls. Ugly indeed, but there were also some dodgy scenes in Birmingham during the Blues-Villa game (albeit not as bad as Newcastle-Sunderland, but you catch my drift), but who gets the most coverage in the Daily Mail? Of course, it's the poor, Labour voting thugs on Tyne and Wearside:

The title of the article is magnificent:

Sunderland vow to boot out thugs after crowd violence erupts in derby showdown with Newcastle

because you can't cram too much provocative language into one sentence.

Of course, the Mail need a nice big picture of the thugs fighting one another, and an equally big picture further down the page showing a big, tattooed man scuffling with Police, just to drill home the 'Ooh! Look at those horrible Northerners fighting at a football match!' effect. Yet what about Villa-Birmingham? Ah yes, further down the page are the pictures with the trails of smoke from a smoke bomb (with a Police officer handily caught up in the midst to get the Mail going about the lower classes) and a line of Police trying to paint the football fans in a bad light despite the fact there wasn't much fighting. Of course, they are two small pictures because they don't want to draw the attention away from the scummy Northerners. They also seem to think the idea of banning hooligans from grounds is a new concept, but then again, it's the Daily Mail, they probably think they're too upper class to go to football matches.

I'm not going to lie: the violence was unacceptable, as was throwing a smoke bomb onto a pitch, yet the pictures in the Mail make it look like everyone at the Tyne-Wear game was fighting. Think about it: the Stadium of Light holds around 49,000, at the most there would have been 100 people fighting, so that leaves 48,900 law abiding fans. Of course, the Mail doesn't furnish us with the fact that only 24 (or 33, depending on your source) arrests were made because they want it to look like all the Northerners were scrapping, then again, the other papers were no better. The Sun, The Mirror, The Times and another paper Mr Vowl loves with a passion: The Express

The picture pushes all of their buttons: a Northern thug of student age wearing a hoodie, it couldn't have been better for them unless Diana had rolled in to calm the violence. For some reason they appear to have put the word attack in speech marks. What was attacking Steve Harper if it wasn't an attack? 'A Northern scuffle' probably.

If you take a look at the BBC's article it seems quite fair despite the jab at European fans at the bottom of the page, but compared to The Star's it is slim pickings. The Star's article is perfectly summed up in the title: Steve Bruce's Fan Fury, basically an Orwellian Two Minutes Hate for the football world. Was Bruce furious about the fans? erm...no, he spent the majority of his interview praising the fans who handed the Harper attacker over to the Police.

Taken in isolation the violence itself is bad enough, but today every paper had either the back page or a double spread painted with pictures of Geordies and Mackems fighting it out to try and paint us in the worst image possible (not surprisingly, there were no pictures of the smoke bombs at St. Andrews). The Tory-orientated papers were the worst culprits, the Mail being the worst example and The Star the worst for vocabulary (article and spelling wise). Of course this sort of thing will sell their glorified bundles of dead tree, but as proved in the past it will only succeed in stoking the fires of hatred. First it was Labour, then the Muslims and then the Poles. This time it's Northerners, football fans or both.

P.S. I apologise for the blatant plagiarism of Mr Vowl's other post title: Chris Jeffries and his Trial by Media

26Nov/1015

99% of polls are rubbish

Today's Express declares that 99% of readers want to get out of Europe!

I know what you're thinking. You're thinking "But wait, Britain is in Europe anyway, what do they mean out of Europe? Oh, leaving the EU. This kind of witless buffoonery makes my brain hurt a bit, it's a bit early to think about it on a Friday morning", and of course you're right. But I wonder if the DAILY EXPRESS CRUSADE marks a bit of a paradigm shift - not just unpleasant about Muslims and foreign people, but actively wanting to court the Ukip/Tory right vote as well.

Is it true that 99% of YOU want to get out of Europe? Well, no, of course not. You may remember the Daily Star poll which found 98% of its readers feared Britain was becoming a Muslim state. Genuinely becoming a Muslim state. These things are self-selecting; it's only the people who agree with the daftness in the first place who go that extra yard to pick up the phone and vote, creating a nice little revenue stream out of impotent rage. You know that and I know that; the Express pretends it doesn't know that so makes out that it's 99% of YOU who are demanding the withdrawal from Europe, when they know it's just a few angry people with a telephone and a sense of furious injustice. Who's going to bother to vote no?

I wonder whether all this is counterproductive, though, for these papers. The Star says 98% of its readers fear Britain is becoming a Muslim state - what about all those readers who don't, but are being told that's what their papers stands for? And what of the people ambivalent towards the EU or even in favour, who will be left bemused by the apparent landslide for the EXPRESS CRUSADE? Do they think to themselves they'd better start getting another paper? Maybe not, but I think it's clear the Express and Star are aiming low as they try to cling on to readers. It looks like fear is the key. Fear about Muslims, fear about Europe, fear about anything 'foreign'. It's going to get worse.

24Nov/1020

How dare people care about others

At a time when the only coverage of police issues revolves around angry confrontations with protesters, it's good to have a story about the cops showing their more caring community-based face, isn't it?

Well, it is, unless you're the Daily Express*. Cops trying to show respect for trans people is HOSTING POLITICALLY CORRECT CANDLELIT VIGILS FOR SEX SWAP CRIME VICTIMS. It really is PC gone mad, isn't it?!?!? And of course, some 'critics' are wheeled in to tut-tut at this reaching-out by the police:

But critics questioned whether sending police officers to the events was a wise use of resources in the face of looming budget cuts. Tory community safety spokesman Bill Aitken said: “Clearly, anyone who has been the victim of crime deserves to be remembered... I am surprised that the police had the time and resources at a weekend to carry out this service. Perhaps things are not as tight as they think.”

It's the classic 'public expenditure / PC gone mad' narrative: here are these diversity-loving bleeding hearts, wasting taxpayer cash on, ugh, being inclusive and stuff, when they could be, well, doing something else instead. But here's what is really unpleasant:

Richard Cook, of the Campaign Against Political Correctness, added: “The police need to remember that catching criminals is the reason people pay their taxes in the first place, not for them to hold vigils like this.”

Do you know what, Richard Cook, of the Campaign Against Political Correctness? You're wrong. Don't you dare tell me what I want my tax money spent on. This is what irks me most about the Tax Payers Alliance / Campaign Against Political Correctness astroturf rentaquotes: they presume to speak on everyone's behalf, and are taken as such by the journalists involved to try and create an angle. But where is the welcoming for this move by the trans community?

No, this isn't news, this is just one-sided pie-chucking. The paper says "Strathclyde Police statistics show that there have been no homophobic murders or attempted murders since officers started recording hate crimes", as if murders or attempted murders are the sum total of all hate crimes. It's wilfully bad journalism. So some police took some time out to go and try a bit of outreach? Good for them, and as a taxpayer I, for one, am very glad they're doing that. But then, no-one asks for my comment on these stories, because I'm not going to give the desired 'PC gone mad' quote.

* I'm not sure if this version is specific to the Scottish Daily Express or is there for everyone to enjoy.

26Oct/1010

EDL threatens to ‘close towns’ which aren’t Christian enough. How very Christian

According to the Daily Star, those cuddly not-at-all-racists at the English Defence League are planning to 'close towns' which aren't Christian enough. How very Christian, you might think.

Mind you, this is the same Daily Star whose readers seem to comprise 98 per cent morons, if their own poll is to be believed.

[The EDL nut's] declaration comes after yesterday’s Daily Star poll found 98% of readers fear that Britain is becoming a Muslim state.

98 per cent. Ninety-eight per cent of Star readers fear that Britain is becoming a Muslim state. Now, it's easy to point to the publications of Richard Desmond - the Daily Express and Daily Star - and wonder why exactly that kind of fear might be occurring at such an alarming rate

But then again, you have to wonder. Are these publications merely reflecting their readers' views, or are they creating them? Or do they create a self-perpetuating confirmation bias in the readers? When it comes to things like online polls, are they too easily rigged?

One thing is for sure, though. The Star and Express don't take the EDL to task when it comes to perpetuating the same old "Christmas is banned" stories - because that would dismantle a whole cheery industry that pops up every year to give lazy hacks something to write about, with bonus anti-'them' points. Stories like this Christmas cracker from 2008:

CHRISTMAS and Easter have been scrubbed from a college’s calendars in case they offend non-Christians.

...

Last night Ms Kitching said  pupils would still be celebrating Christmas. She insisted: “There has been no big plan to ban the word Christmas.”

CHRISTMAS IS BANNED (except it isn't, but shhhhhhhhh). With stories like that knocking about every time the leaves start to fall, it's no wonder that the good folk of the EDL really believe - and I'm pretty sure they really do believe - that the evil PC Brigade has indeed gone mad once again and will be BANNING CHRISTMAS for fear of upsetting THAT LOT.

Do you know, I almost feel sorry for the EDL types who hoover up that kind of crap from the likes of the Star and Express. They're looking for it, so they see it everywhere. And when they're not challenged, it creates a snowball effect, leading to stuff like this:

A FAR-RIGHT group has vowed to “close down” any town that ditches British traditions and shows favouritism to Muslims.

Well, that'll be none, then. Same as every year, ever. We all know about the Winterval myths that get recycled and embellished every year. But what if a misleading, deliberately skewed story misrepresented a town, and it suffered an 'invasion' from the EDL? Would that be all right? Would the people who wrote the rubbish walk off whistling, pleased with a good day's work?

*update* The EDL are, as you'd imagine, delighted with the coverage from the Daily Star. As one EDL blogger puts it (I won't link): "This is the first article I have read, from both the national and regional media, that hasn't been critical of the EDL." And also:

Perhaps we can expect more objective, or unbiased, articles on the EDL from the Daily Star. And if that becomes the case, I would advise EDL members to stop reading the Sun, the Mirror, the Daily Mail, etc. and start reading the Daily Star - after all, there are not many tabloids which are fair to the EDL.

Job done, Daily Star. Hold your heads high, you must be terrifically proud of yourselves. (Thanks to Press_Not_Sorry for the link)

27Sep/101

Housekeeping 1: What the actual fuck?

I've noticed a couple of pictures on my desktop that I hadn't used for blog posts last week, so I thought I'd tidy them up by posting them up. Here's the first, quite a delightful front page from last week's Daily Express:

So many questions enter your head at once. Why is it 'hooray'? Why does the Express believe in scientists when they're talking about the ozone layer, but not when they're talking about climate change? By using words like 'rotter' and 'hooray' on a front page, are they actually taking the piss out of themselves or are they just trying to sound like the fucking Beano in 1955? Is the nice orange dog going to be deported because it's an immigrant? Who was the benefit cheat who was sent to jail? Why was it 'at last', as if it never happens at any other time? Is the Express losing the plot? Is Richard Desmond trying to make his newspaper a laughing stock? Or is it a laughing stock already?

Hooray!

23Sep/103

Spivs!

From today's Daily Express:

VINCE Cable stepped up his extraordinary class war attack on capitalism yesterday by calling for punitive new taxes on middle-class wealth.

Despite a barrage of protest about his anti-capitalist rhetoric, the Business Secretary pressed ahead with a ferocious onslaught on the “spivs and gamblers” of the City in his speech on the final day of the Lib Dem Liverpool conference.

Yes, who on earth would use 'anti-capitalist rhetoric' like the word 'spivs' to describe bankers?

Oh, I see. When it's Vince Cable doing it, it's class war. When it's the Express, they're just 'speaking their mind'. I'm glad we've cleared that one up.

20Aug/105

Don’t stop deceiving

The Express today carries a feelgood story about how True DynaMIX are helping Bridgend cope with the aftermath of its teenage suicides by appearing on Channel Five's Don't Stop Believing. The nature of the plug for Channel Five, recently obtained by Express owner Richard Desmond, is rather more obvious in the dead-tree version, which has the subtle-as-a-brick headline: "Channel Five show lifts spirits of town hit by teen suicides".

Which is all fair enough. Except there's something nagging away at me. Which newspaper was it that came out with a load of wildly inaccurate speculation over the cause of the teenagers' deaths while the memory was still fresh in the minds of the parents?

Ah yes. As Ben Goldacre pointed out at the time, it was just the opinion of one person, and he didn't have the data available to prove his argument. Either the Express hadn't bothered to find out whether what he was saying was true or not, or they knew it wasn't something that could be stacked up, and went ahead with it anyway. It was a scaremongering article that did nothing to get to the bottom of the matter and may have caused a lot of distress for the relatives of those who had died.

Still, at least Richard Desmond's Channel Five is trying its best to make up for the pain that Richard Desmond's Sunday Express might have caused. I guess that's something.