<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ah, but&#8230; oh, er&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/</link>
	<description>Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>Actually - ignore this comment - point three is a load of bollocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually &#8211; ignore this comment &#8211; point three is a load of bollocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>Richard T - not quite.

1. We&#039;re an ageing population and therefore therefore this is a response to the projections of number of workforce going forward.

2. There is not a fixed number of jobs.

3. What &quot;income&quot;? The State Pension? You have to formally retire to claim it.  And, frankly, surely the Government will be quite happy with older people still paying into the Pension Fund with their NI, than actually drawing it out.

Of course, working *after* retirement is a completely different ball-game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard T &#8211; not quite.</p>
<p>1. We&#8217;re an ageing population and therefore therefore this is a response to the projections of number of workforce going forward.</p>
<p>2. There is not a fixed number of jobs.</p>
<p>3. What &#8220;income&#8221;? The State Pension? You have to formally retire to claim it.  And, frankly, surely the Government will be quite happy with older people still paying into the Pension Fund with their NI, than actually drawing it out.</p>
<p>Of course, working *after* retirement is a completely different ball-game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard T</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>So, from the department of unintended consquences, when the supply of jobs for young people dries up because folk in their 60s who will have an income anyway want to keep on working wait for the screaming headlines about youth unemployment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, from the department of unintended consquences, when the supply of jobs for young people dries up because folk in their 60s who will have an income anyway want to keep on working wait for the screaming headlines about youth unemployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6419</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;ve somehow managed to both be right - almost what Richard said, but the legal ruling means that even in the future firms can individually decide their own cut-off point (whereas at the moment 65 is the automatic for all companies).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;ve somehow managed to both be right &#8211; almost what Richard said, but the legal ruling means that even in the future firms can individually decide their own cut-off point (whereas at the moment 65 is the automatic for all companies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlipC</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator>FlipC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6415</guid>
		<description>I forget are we supposed to be booing Eastasia or Eurasia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forget are we supposed to be booing Eastasia or Eurasia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Applejack</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Applejack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6414</guid>
		<description>The parasailing death one is a curious thing on the Mail site. All these Mail readers clamouring for more stringent health and safety regulations. Yoo cudden mayk idup!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parasailing death one is a curious thing on the Mail site. All these Mail readers clamouring for more stringent health and safety regulations. Yoo cudden mayk idup!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard.</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6413</guid>
		<description>Both right. Mail is future, Express is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both right. Mail is future, Express is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Stott</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/07/28/ah-but-oh-er/comment-page-1/#comment-6412</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=2360#comment-6412</guid>
		<description>This may be a clever marketing move by the Express. Look at the Mail&#039;s frontpage headline, and turn the same topic into DOOMSDAY FEAR, whatever the reality.

Sure, it&#039;s about as ethical as a real-life re-enactment of a Jimmy Carr joke, but if it boosts turnover, who gives a chimp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a clever marketing move by the Express. Look at the Mail&#8217;s frontpage headline, and turn the same topic into DOOMSDAY FEAR, whatever the reality.</p>
<p>Sure, it&#8217;s about as ethical as a real-life re-enactment of a Jimmy Carr joke, but if it boosts turnover, who gives a chimp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

