Comments on: Express and ‘ethnics’: Now the veil has gone

By: The 21st Floor » Blog Archive » The Patriotism Delusion

The 21st Floor » Blog Archive » The Patriotism Delusion — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:14:21 +0000

[...] a rabble-rousing demagogue, and nowhere is this more evident than in the pages of newspapers like The Daily Express and The Daily Mail. The Daily Mail in particular managed to stoop so low as to carry on this [...]

By: Muslims and immigration « The Not-Quite-So-Friendly Humanist

Muslims and immigration « The Not-Quite-So-Friendly Humanist — Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:01:38 +0000

[...] press (and the EDL and the BNP by the way) mean when they say ‘indigenous population’. They mean white people. But they can’t say that because they’d get ripped apart, it’s too obvious. So [...]

By: At least no-one used the word “ethnics” « Atomic Spin

At least no-one used the word “ethnics” « Atomic Spin — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:57:48 +0000

[...] the Express mentions it too in less detail (no word this time on how many of these will be “ethnics“). The population will jump to 77million by the middle of the century with France, which has [...]

By: My Problem With… newspapers. « The Nerd Rage Blog

My Problem With… newspapers. « The Nerd Rage Blog — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:22:36 +0000

[...] has recently rejoined the fray, with not-even-concealed-at-all racism – headlines like “One in five Britons will be Ethnics” , “Keep Out, Britain Is Full”, and, in a fun combination of homo-and-xenophobia, [...]

By: Claire

Claire — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:29:45 +0000

Years ago a middle aged man I was standing next to in WH Smith was puce with anger at a headline in the Daily Mail. ‘Look at that, that’s disgusting, what a world, we’re all going to hell in a handbasket’ etc etc. I looked at the headline and it was indeed disgusting so I replied that you don’t get much else but disgusting in the DM and that maybe he should buy a proper newspaper. Or the Daily Mirror at least.
I have to say I don’t think he understood my meaning. Ah well.

By: McTodd

McTodd — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:22:15 +0000

Nice one – years ago I did a DAILY HEIL mock-up for a spoof news website I co-wrote. Never ended up using it, wish I had now…

On the main subject – Christ, I’m depressed now. Generally, I avoid looking at newspaper frontpages nowadays because they’re so rancid, but this one really takes the biscuit.

By: George Allwell

George Allwell — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:41:05 +0000

Fuck the ethnic’s I say, in fact, as well as fucking, I always find its good talking to the ethnic; they usually have something positive to say. In further fact, I reckon just about every person I’ve ever met has been ethnic of some variety or other – so much so, even the natives can’t decide which tone of brown is the best to purchase – so I reckon the Express highlights a major factual bullcrap. The UK is pretty much 5 in 5 for ethnic’s. But the Express Daily Star of the Mail clearly refuse to understand language, or culture or history or facts or reality, but hey… I’ll take a Pepsi/IndianFizzPop challenge with any right-wing fear-merchant over the genetic make-up of this racially unpure ‘nation’…

By: We’re full | only that in you

We’re full | only that in you — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:37:17 +0000

[...] MacGuffin and others have covered the way the tabloids reported this. As you’ve probably guessed it’s a [...]

By: About that front page… | exclarotive

About that front page… | exclarotive — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:56:26 +0000

[...] sheer nastiness and illogic of the thing has been ably covered elsewhere, particularly here, here, here, and here. The picture used for the online article is especially [...]

By: Tabloid Watch: Richard Desmond attacks ‘ethnics’ and ‘asylum scroungers’ | Screenagers.me

Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:29:18 +0000

[...] Anton at Enemies of Reason has blogged about the Express’ front page. He says: Leave aside that we’re all ‘ethnics’ of one mongrel sort or another; this makes it quite clear what’s going on. There are whites and there are ‘ethnics’. How much more explicit does it have to be before we start calling it what it is? [...]