<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8216;Facebook perv&#8217; and being scared of technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/</link>
	<description>Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whybird</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>Whybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>You might be interested to know that they&#039;ve now issued an apology after one of their articles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/daily-mail-apologises-for-facebook-underage-sex-claims-1919747.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;outright lied&lt;/a&gt; about Facebook.

(Sadly, the article I&#039;ve linked to hasn&#039;t linked to the Mail&#039;s apology, so I can&#039;t verify it, and I worry that &quot;The web giant is now considering taking legal action against the newspaper. &quot; is just wishful thinking on the Independent&#039;s behalf, but it&#039;s nice news anyway.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested to know that they&#8217;ve now issued an apology after one of their articles <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/daily-mail-apologises-for-facebook-underage-sex-claims-1919747.html" rel="nofollow">outright lied</a> about Facebook.</p>
<p>(Sadly, the article I&#8217;ve linked to hasn&#8217;t linked to the Mail&#8217;s apology, so I can&#8217;t verify it, and I worry that &#8220;The web giant is now considering taking legal action against the newspaper. &#8221; is just wishful thinking on the Independent&#8217;s behalf, but it&#8217;s nice news anyway.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Tweets about Facebook as of March 11, 2010 &#124; Learn To Sell Phones</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Tweets about Facebook as of March 11, 2010 &#124; Learn To Sell Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>[...] &#183; View    BadWisdom523: &#8216;Facebook perv&#8217; and being scared of technology &#8211; http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/ 2010-03-11 09:25:48 &#183; Reply &#183; View    stephdouglas: i just saw that woman from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &middot; View    BadWisdom523: &#8216;Facebook perv&#8217; and being scared of technology &#8211; <a href="http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/" rel="nofollow">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/</a> 2010-03-11 09:25:48 &middot; Reply &middot; View    stephdouglas: i just saw that woman from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>I still love the Mail headline for this;
&#039;Who could YOUR child be talking to?&#039;

YOUR child. YOU. They&#039;re probably dead already. You idiot. Look what you&#039;ve done. Get upstairs now and chain them to the wall, in case they DIE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still love the Mail headline for this;<br />
&#8216;Who could YOUR child be talking to?&#8217;</p>
<p>YOUR child. YOU. They&#8217;re probably dead already. You idiot. Look what you&#8217;ve done. Get upstairs now and chain them to the wall, in case they DIE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS Clark</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>CS Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>Yeah, NewsCorp would never refer to MySpace killers.

Oh wait - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2827009.ece 

(&lt;i&gt;Of course&lt;/i&gt; they would love to have a MySpace killer, just to remind people that it exists).

And this idea that people are deliberately pushing some kind of clever-clever anti-internets agenda is somewhat paranoid, as well as being pandering to your audience and scaremongering itself. Don&#039;t worry, they&#039;re not trying to take your tubes from you. You&#039;re not brave to take a stand against this. They just tend to pick the most obvious aspect of a murder case to make it stand out in the headline and to fill space. You know, motorway killer, pub killer, lonely hearts killer, supermarket killer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, NewsCorp would never refer to MySpace killers.</p>
<p>Oh wait &#8211; <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2827009.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2827009.ece</a> </p>
<p>(<i>Of course</i> they would love to have a MySpace killer, just to remind people that it exists).</p>
<p>And this idea that people are deliberately pushing some kind of clever-clever anti-internets agenda is somewhat paranoid, as well as being pandering to your audience and scaremongering itself. Don&#8217;t worry, they&#8217;re not trying to take your tubes from you. You&#8217;re not brave to take a stand against this. They just tend to pick the most obvious aspect of a murder case to make it stand out in the headline and to fill space. You know, motorway killer, pub killer, lonely hearts killer, supermarket killer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxy_Hart</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxy_Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>The DM yesterday were in fury about a facebook page that wrongly names a man as being the new identity of Jon Venables.  
They seemed confused as to how to report it in that they desperatly want Venables identity unmasked but when someone on FB tries to do that they are calling it pretty much evil for accusing an innocent man and putting his life in danger...which obviously would never happen if a newspaper revealed it because their research is so thorough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DM yesterday were in fury about a facebook page that wrongly names a man as being the new identity of Jon Venables.<br />
They seemed confused as to how to report it in that they desperatly want Venables identity unmasked but when someone on FB tries to do that they are calling it pretty much evil for accusing an innocent man and putting his life in danger&#8230;which obviously would never happen if a newspaper revealed it because their research is so thorough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3799</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Jon Venables a.k.a. &quot;The Shopping Centre Killer&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Jon Venables a.k.a. &#8220;The Shopping Centre Killer&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Davison</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Davison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>Indeed. It also strikes me as odd that the &quot;powers that be&quot; seem to think that Facebook adding a &quot;Report&quot; button will stop this sort of thing from happening. Facebook already has a system for reporting abuse, and this girl didn&#039;t use it, because she trusted the man to be who he said he was. How would a different button with the same function make any difference if people are being taken in by predators like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. It also strikes me as odd that the &#8220;powers that be&#8221; seem to think that Facebook adding a &#8220;Report&#8221; button will stop this sort of thing from happening. Facebook already has a system for reporting abuse, and this girl didn&#8217;t use it, because she trusted the man to be who he said he was. How would a different button with the same function make any difference if people are being taken in by predators like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Carl</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>Not forgetting of course, News Corp owns rival MySpace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not forgetting of course, News Corp owns rival MySpace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakoub</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakoub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>On a similar line, Doug Stanhope on MySpace Pedophiles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8APlx9btTn8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a similar line, Doug Stanhope on MySpace Pedophiles: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8APlx9btTn8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8APlx9btTn8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/03/09/the-facebook-perv-and-being-scared-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1503#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a serious attempt to demonise the medium of social networking ... This is an awful and rare crime, but linking it to social networking doesn&#039;t do anyone any favours&lt;/i&gt;

Well, it does help a bit if your agenda includes making the internet less free (whether in financial or communication terms) and pushing for a nice Informational Commons Enclosure Act to protect the right sort of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a serious attempt to demonise the medium of social networking &#8230; This is an awful and rare crime, but linking it to social networking doesn&#8217;t do anyone any favours</i></p>
<p>Well, it does help a bit if your agenda includes making the internet less free (whether in financial or communication terms) and pushing for a nice Informational Commons Enclosure Act to protect the right sort of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

