<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is being anti-immigration racist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/</link>
	<description>Poundshop potshots at the media moral maze.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Behind Labour&#8217;s secret &#8216;multicultural plot&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Behind Labour&#8217;s secret &#8216;multicultural plot&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>[...] Labour was talking about the Express, they were bang on the money.&#160; Same joke as Anton and MacGuffin, but I couldn&#8217;t let that one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labour was talking about the Express, they were bang on the money.&nbsp; Same joke as Anton and MacGuffin, but I couldn&#8217;t let that one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kecks</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Kecks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3584</guid>
		<description>Read the Guardain and the Independant for real objective reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the Guardain and the Independant for real objective reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Vowl</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Vowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>Jesus wept. Sometimes I think they do joke pages and somehow they get printed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus wept. Sometimes I think they do joke pages and somehow they get printed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>I presume you&#039;ve seen the Express&#039;s beyond-parody headline today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I presume you&#8217;ve seen the Express&#8217;s beyond-parody headline today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2hats</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>2hats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t find the original, but the Telegraph has quoted a bit of it here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/7293556/Opponents-of-immigration-could-be-racist-warned-advisers-a-decade-ago.html

The parts they&#039;ve quoted seem pretty much right on the money to me. You often see anti-immigrant types spouting bollocks like &quot;immigration might be all well and good for you well-off Guardian-reading liberals, but what about how it affects the ordinary working class people who actually have to live with it?&quot;

But then why aren&#039;t those who live with it actually complaining for themselves? Are we supposed to think the working class are too stupid to express their own opinions? That they need newspaper columnists and rich arseholes like Sir Andrew Green (quoted in that Telegraph article implying that Labour being explicitly pro-immigration would cost them working class support) to do it for them? 

I&#039;m from Manchester, and I know several white working-class people (including my dad) who live in areas of the city with a large immigrant population. And none of them have a problem with it. In fact, the last time I talked to someone who *did* have a problem with it, it was a taxi driver from Stockport. Which is just about the whitest place I&#039;ve ever been. But I&#039;ll give him the benefit of the doubt here - maybe he isn&#039;t actually racist, maybe he was just speaking out of a misguided concern for his fellow man. After all, there was a copy of the Express in his cab. If that shite serves as his main source of news, I wouldn&#039;t blame him for having a skewed view of the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t find the original, but the Telegraph has quoted a bit of it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/7293556/Opponents-of-immigration-could-be-racist-warned-advisers-a-decade-ago.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/7293556/Opponents-of-immigration-could-be-racist-warned-advisers-a-decade-ago.html</a></p>
<p>The parts they&#8217;ve quoted seem pretty much right on the money to me. You often see anti-immigrant types spouting bollocks like &#8220;immigration might be all well and good for you well-off Guardian-reading liberals, but what about how it affects the ordinary working class people who actually have to live with it?&#8221;</p>
<p>But then why aren&#8217;t those who live with it actually complaining for themselves? Are we supposed to think the working class are too stupid to express their own opinions? That they need newspaper columnists and rich arseholes like Sir Andrew Green (quoted in that Telegraph article implying that Labour being explicitly pro-immigration would cost them working class support) to do it for them? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m from Manchester, and I know several white working-class people (including my dad) who live in areas of the city with a large immigrant population. And none of them have a problem with it. In fact, the last time I talked to someone who *did* have a problem with it, it was a taxi driver from Stockport. Which is just about the whitest place I&#8217;ve ever been. But I&#8217;ll give him the benefit of the doubt here &#8211; maybe he isn&#8217;t actually racist, maybe he was just speaking out of a misguided concern for his fellow man. After all, there was a copy of the Express in his cab. If that shite serves as his main source of news, I wouldn&#8217;t blame him for having a skewed view of the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>One muppet complained to the DM &quot;This is, and should be, the biggest story of this century but no other outlet is mentioning it.&quot;

Maybe, just maybe, this is because the &#039;story&#039; is a pile of shite. When only Migrationwatch, the Mail and Express have it and no-one else touches it with a bargepole*, it probably means someone is making 2+2=67

*Apart from the BNP of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One muppet complained to the DM &#8220;This is, and should be, the biggest story of this century but no other outlet is mentioning it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe, just maybe, this is because the &#8216;story&#8217; is a pile of shite. When only Migrationwatch, the Mail and Express have it and no-one else touches it with a bargepole*, it probably means someone is making 2+2=67</p>
<p>*Apart from the BNP of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by antonvowl: New Enemies: Is being anti-immigration racist? http://bit.ly/bPTBma...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by antonvowl: New Enemies: Is being anti-immigration racist? <a href="http://bit.ly/bPTBma.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bPTBma..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pickled Politics &#187; Tories show their nasty side again</title>
		<link>http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/2010/02/23/is-being-anti-immigration-racist/comment-page-1/#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>Pickled Politics &#187; Tories show their nasty side again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enemiesofreason.co.uk/?p=1382#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>[...] racist&#8217;. Typically, the reasoning behind it is so obtuse that it would take ages to explain. Thankfully, Anton Vowl has done it. Read that blog post and you&#8217;ll see how wrong they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] racist&#8217;. Typically, the reasoning behind it is so obtuse that it would take ages to explain. Thankfully, Anton Vowl has done it. Read that blog post and you&#8217;ll see how wrong they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

