Tiger Woods: Who gives a shit?
I should put my hands up here at the very beginning and admit I don't like golf. Other than knocking a ball through the windmill at a windswept Camber Sands when I was younger, I've never played it. And yet quite rational people I know, who are perfectly reasonable in other ways, seem to regard it as some kind of religion. When they 'get golf' you hardly see them ever again; their lives consist of wearing slightly odd-looking trousers and knitwear, and disappointedly tut-tutting at you for not wanting to be frozen to death at 7.20am every Saturday. You find yourself slipping out of their lives as the golf takes a stronger grip on them, until... then they're gone. The golf has won.
Watching it on TV has never really interested me either. A bit of green, a bit of blue, a bit of green - and some screaming nutcase roaring "Getinthehole!" when the ball is quite clearly not going anywhere near it - like it'd listen to him anyway.
But that's beside the point. Even I've heard of Tiger Woods. And despite his massive celebrity, I can't help asking the question: who gives a shit? What's happened over the past few days has been fairly ridiculous. Sure, he had a car accident. And...? Ah, but there's something else involved, a suspicion that he's had an affair, and the papers have reverted to their 1970s type. Ooh men and women doing it, they whoop, like teenage boys talking about fucking behind the bike sheds! And then you have the tragic misogyny of the Sun, as ever, talking about a 'girl' who is Tiger's 'birdie', I mean how cheap is that?
Oh sorry, my mistake, that was the Telegraph, Britain's top selling quality newspaper, who decided that kind of outdated shit was worth putting on the front page of their paper. Good on them for outdoing the tabloids and getting something thoroughly unpleasant and derogatory into a national newspaper; well done for that. Still, now that Woods has appealed for privacy over his private and personal affairs, it's obviously open season:
I'm still wondering who really gives a shit, though. So what? I don't know if there's some attempt to expose hypocrisy but I don't remember Tiger Woods moralising to the rest of the world about what a great guy he was and how he'd never have an affair, or even traded on his family image in advertising. I don't think so, and even then it'd still be fairly tenuous as to why we were meant to be reading about this in our newspapers. Aren't there more important things going on in the world?
But they're all at it. The women said to have had affairs with Woods are mere window-dressing for these newspapers and I find it all a bit juvenile and faintly tragic, but maybe that's just me. Maybe everyone else is really interested in all this and amazed by every single detail. Maybe there's something else going on about the blackness of Tiger and the whiteness of the women involved, but I don't really understand that either.
Maybe I'm missing something. Maybe this is really important news and I don't understand it because I'm too slow, but a lot of people in the media seem to think that we're all dumbfounded and gripped by this story. I'm not. I couldn't care less. Even if I liked golf, I think it'd be a case of: so fucking what? So human beings behave like human beings - is it really worth invading their privacy? Is it really to our benefit to hear the phone calls, see the photos, have all the details of this spilled out in the papers, while elsewhere there is real news that is being ignored?
Maybe this is about it being cheap journalism, where newsdesks can be spoonfed everything they need without ever bothering to leave the office. All the pictures and video and audio come straight to them. Maybe I am missing the point entirely and this is the biggest story in the history of the world ever, and we'll look back in 50 years and say: Do you remember where you were when Tiger Woods had a car accident and then some people said they'd fucked him? Do you remember that? Cor, hasn't journalism gone downhill since then?
No related posts.






December 3rd, 2009 - 09:12
I was interested in this story when I heard Tiger Woods had been in a car crash, I was worried 2009 was going to take another celebrity. If he's had an affair I'm sure the only person it matters to is his wife.
December 3rd, 2009 - 10:10
I personally couldn’t care less what Tiger Woods does in his private time. I really don't get why its front page news. I imagine though it’s the same reason why there are magazines dedicated to the lives of celebrities. Because this man is famous, and he’s done something he shouldn’t have done, all of a sudden its front page news. These magazines, and newspapers when they get involved, seem to forget that celebrities are people. Just like normal people, they fuck up. In my opinion, this is a private matter to be dealt with between Tiger Woods and his family, and the newspapers/scandal rags shouldn’t use it as an excuse to sell papers. I imagine the situation is only being made worse for his family by the media worldwide (I assume it is more than our papers that care but honestly don’t know) who keep the story fresh.
December 3rd, 2009 - 10:14
For the Telegraph, isn't it just an excuse to put some "fruity fillies" on the front page? They've got form in this area….
December 3rd, 2009 - 10:39
I like the Torygraph's picture. Get one of her opening a car door, so she's bending down and we can all gawp at her lovely sticky-out arse.
December 3rd, 2009 - 12:26
Apart from being a bog-standard kiss-n-tell yarn, this Tiger Wooods gig is just car-crash-TV, with added media prurience: think Cliff Richard being caught-out lying about why he was caught importuning on the heath, whilst as he spins, a phalanx of rent boys start coming out of the woodwork with "My Story!"
Yes, it's utter gash, but until you quell all societal (bottom-feeding) desire to see/hear this kind of trivia, we're just gonna have to live with it (or have a thromby fulminating about it).
Was Tiger Woods 'playing the back nine'…?
What I found funny (and there is deep humour to be seen in this story) is the genuinely pathetic attempt at a cover-up job when it first broke.
December 3rd, 2009 - 15:27
He's done the world no wrong, there's nothing intrinsically morally wrong with having an affair. Why is he apologising to the press? If his wife is upset by it then that's for them to discuss, but she might be broad minded enough to accept it anyway.
December 3rd, 2009 - 18:46
It's so pants the media only ever reports crud like u say cheap gags all round like the Jordan aand pete stuff I think even those dumb twats who buy heat must be over it by now
December 3rd, 2009 - 21:01
C'mon, Anton.
You gotta admit this is big news.
December 6th, 2009 - 02:10
It's prurience, not news. That the Daily Telegraph should splash the pictures of the "birdies" over its front page is sadly no surprise. The only heartening thing about the reporting of this story is that to date, there have been no nasty insinuations about him being black. And I agree with you, the story has zero "news" value. Man is famous golfer. Man has affair. And?
The term "quality newspaper" surely no longer applies to the DT, however, on this evidence, and you should stop using it forthwith on the grounds of misdescription.