Does the benefit system favour migrants?
It does according to the Daily Telegraph, who are just as capable of repeating BNP immigration myths while simultaneously distancing themselves from the extremists.
In a piece entitled 'Telegraph View' (I believe it's the leader column) published on Friday, there appears this line:
The white working class who live there are resentful of the way the benefits system is skewed towards immigrant families: the long tail of this recession could whip up yet more support for the BNP, despite its leader's feeble performance on Question Time.
Let me just run that past you again:
The white working class who live there are resentful of the way the benefits system is skewed towards immigrant families
Not 'appears to be' but 'is'. No evidence to back that assertion up. It just is. Skewed.
Now I know this is an opinion piece and as a piece of polemic is representing a particular point of view rather than an objective look at the facts. That's fine by me. But how is the benefit system "skewed towards immigrant families"?
The myths of queue-jumping have been exploded very clearly, time and time again. For example, one national newspaper in July this year covered a story which was headlined
Immigrants do not get housing priority, study shows
which had this quote:
The far-right [BNP] spread rumours in target seats that immigrants were given precedence in the queue for social housing accommodation.
Does that sound a bit like
the benefits system is skewed towards immigrant families
to you? Because it does to me. Still, the newspaper (which you have by now correctly identified as the Daily Telegraph) carried on:
The IPPR found no evidence of queue jumping or abuse of the system by immigrants but warned that those perceptions were widespread in certain areas.
Yes, I wonder which nasty types have been creating such perceptions? I imagine the kind of people who would say that the benefits system favours migrants - people like the Daily Telegraph, in its leader column - the column which "is the opinion of the Daily Telegraph".
Does the system favour migrants? Well, a look back through the Telegraph's very own archive yields this article, which states quite clearly:
A policy that stops Eastern European migrant workers accessing most benefits for at least a year is to remain in place amid fears lifting the restriction will increase unemployment among Britons.
The continued existence of the worker registration scheme for European migrants would appear to suggest that, far from actively favouring migrants, the benefit system is actively skewed against them.
How you get from that to saying the system is skewed in favour of migrants I'm not too sure. But it's nice to know it's not just the tabloids who are capable of mixing it with BNP-style rhetoric while at the same time pointing at Griffin and saying: "Ooh, look at the bad man".
Spotter's badge: Malcolm Coles
No related posts.


October 25th, 2009 - 21:17
Nice work sir. I have linked to your last post from my blog, I hope that's ok
October 26th, 2009 - 10:25
It's very demoralising to see them able to 'distance' themselves from the BNP and yet propagate racist views that sound just like the BNP with NO sense of irony.
It's pretty shabby.
October 26th, 2009 - 17:25
There's another aspect to the conservative press's coverage of the benefit system that constantly sickens me, which is the way they equate being on incapacity benefit with being a scrounger. According to them, having a mental health problem means you have a nice time relaxing in front of the TV and living the life of riley (on just enough money to survive…).
The Daily Mail and their ilk would apparently prefer people with depression, or PTSD, or schizophrenia, to just kill themselves to save the taxpayer a few bucks. Or maybe the mentally ill and disabled should be sent to labour camps? I'm sure that's a solution the BNP would favour.
October 26th, 2009 - 19:10
This is just a diversion technique by the main political parties. The spectre of the BNP is used for their unmitigated hypocrisy. This is just an attack on the working class, those that happen to be so called indigenous and those that are from other countries. The BNP is just being used as a not very effective form of camoflauge for the illustrious political parties of the UK. The so called 'success' or techniques of all our mainstream parties is to absorb the views, opinions and policies (if they have such a thing) of those parties/opinion considered extreme such as the BNP.
With regard to disabled people/mental health users and the attempted use of DLA and AA as part of a budget and of course IB now becoming Employment Support Allowance. Yeah well there aren't f…..jobs to be had. Yes effectively the mythical 'they' would prefer mental health users/disabled people to do away with themselves. Just make a living will and when you can't stand living in poverty and misery jut top yourself. They won't stop you as per young woman two/three weeks ago who drank anti-freeze and they just stood by why she died. She had made a living will expressing that she (at age 26) did not want help. So they let her die. At the end of the day it will help the 'economic burden'.
October 28th, 2009 - 14:30
LaTravita: So true. And if you make too many suicide attempts by trying to jump off a bridge, you'll get slapped with an ASBO.
I'm on IB for depression, and I know (and have worked with) many people who are on it for mental illness. They/we face all kinds of barriers in returning to work even if we are capable of doing some.
I've just written a post on this topic, which I hope it's okay to post a link to here.